A question of morality part II

So I've been thinking about this lately. I want opinions about this question "Who is worst, the hit man or the person who orders the hit?"

Okay here's a thought to start you off. Without the hit man the murder wouldn't take place. So the person ordering the hit can want to kill someone all they want but they are no threat in and of themselves as they are not the person doing the actual killing. Sort of the whole guns don't kill people, people kill people idea.

I look forward to hearing from you on this. Thank you.